Sunday, December 18, 2016

Manifold Delivery in Qve

MDS

Time and Engineering the Manifold: Virtual Delivery Systems



SRGEN: Time and Maps: Scoping Requirements

GAP Qve



MAP 1 PRODUCTION

In order to be certain how many views are correctly required in a Manifold Virtual Delivery System in Qve we have to finish determining the Branch Integration.  We are not certain if it works like 6 x 2 x 2 or if it requires 6^2.  It is also possible that 60 Views may result from the overall requirement. But we think that by completing our task, the integration of this process will help us to understand it better.  So we have more steps here to take, since in our last blog we only extended the Significance Function.


Next we have to take a look at our Board and see if we can wire it.  So since this is a lot of work...  we'll have to post our results later.   Second Map of Production, side 2 of 4 12/20/16

Map2 Production

When we first began working with this type of conversion we didn't realize that Volume is removed from the process because Virtual Machines can be cloned.  Space is also removed except for delimited spaces in tiers, etc., but there are still inner branch mechanics to consider.

We have to think about Time many different ways in order to consider both the Timeline and the Manifold Processes.

Measures of Time: (Wikipedia)  Position, Spin (Timeline) and Rotation (Work)
  • transition between two electron spin energy levels of the ground state of the 133Cs atom
  • the Global Positioning System in coordination with the Network Time Protocol can be used to synchronize timekeeping systems across the globe
Changes: The electron spin state will be based on the Quark composition of QLD and positioned with Quonics. 

Progression, Clock (Manifold)

The progression of Time looks something like this in production where 2 x clock time starts the progression at 72 and progressing like a metronome to time the outcome: 0.227272727.  If we use three times clock time we represent the clock as 33 related to the production Map (see Top illustration.)

The hourglass uses the flow of sand to measure the flow of time. They were used in navigation. Ferdinand Magellan used 18 glasses on each ship for his circumnavigation of the globe (1522).[31] Incense sticks and candles were, and are, commonly used to measure time in temples and churches across the globe. Waterclocks, and later, mechanical clocks, were used to mark the events of the abbeys and monasteries of the Middle Ages. Richard of Wallingford (1292–1336), abbot of St. Alban's abbey, famously built a mechanical clock as an astronomical orrery about 1330.[32][33] Great advances in accurate time-keeping were made by Galileo Galilei and especially Christiaan Huygens with the invention of pendulum driven clocks along with the invention of the minute hand by Jost Burgi, Wikipedia





We often demonstrate time like this:  A position that denotes the progress made on a Timeline in meeting pre-determined requirements.  Motion in terms of Time has these motions:  Spin, Rotation, Progression, which includes Work.  The determination of the correct level of work is Speed and Distance.  The Progression is responsible for creating the Fulcrum or Leverage in the System.  The smaller the unit of measure of time the more likely accurate the measure will be, in order to manage the curve.



What we are saying is this:  It is not enough to differentiate the Cube.  Since the timing of everything has to be measured as a requirement of RUN, determining the requirements of the Manifold is just as important as these two Quantum Cube Performance Mechanics are part of the System.  So that while we are defining the Conversion that takes place within the Cube, we also need to study the requirements to generate these Progressions and other norms of the Cube.

If Circumnavigating a sphere was all that was required 18 branch measures may be enough.  Taking a developmental View of the manifold, requires us to consider that 18 x 2 is Significance.  But there are three more measures that take into account the motion of the progression in and around the cube.

Significance plus motion is 36 + (22 x 2) = 80.  We believe these are columns and don't represent Views.
There are both Horizontal columns and Vertical Columns in the Quantum System.  The top of the cube and the bottom of the cube don't count as a View. The cost rate applied to String is 44.  As we are producing product in the ONE System, string is generated.  So the QLD Energy Cube is funding the Production Cube.  This is somewhat like our universe but it is a direct refresh rate rather than a translated process of multi-task and formative direction. In order to achieve a high degree of perpetual motion in our universe a lot of push energy has to be invested, and this is an inefficient type of architecture.

PRODUCTION

In the ONE System the turning, tuning and timing of production is immediate and defines the Work.  But the entire System will Spin, Rotate and have multi-level Progression within it.  So the Manifold has not only Work related functions but Maintenance functions related to System Architecture.  We have used Business Conversion as the Production method to enable us to emulate Work.  But this production method includes the entire business process.

If you study branch numbers long enough you begin to see more than one pattern here including a mapping pattern which turns a progression.  The maps are as important as the numbers they progress.

0.227272727

We have also studied the steps created in the patterns related to Variable Rate Demand.  Changes in the patterns of the way production metrics present themselves have a definite effect on the way the system operates.  So we have looked at the idea of rotational requirements and time distribution.

This is why one view of the branching is not enough to be certain that the requirements will be met correctly. 

While we have emulated Time on the Manifold to develop this idea in our scope, we are working at the manifold idea now from a different point of view.  Scale is only one aspect of Time and Motion.  This is primarily arranged as speed to the Post:




BACKGROUND:  Two concepts of Production include Events and Time-Stamp

Chronology


Main article: Chronology
Another form of time measurement consists of studying the past. Events in the past can be ordered in a sequence (creating a chronology), and can be put into chronological groups (periodization). One of the most important systems of periodization is the geologic time scale, which is a system of periodizing the events that shaped the Earth and its life. Chronology, periodization, and interpretation of the past are together known as the study of history.

Time-like concepts: terminology

The term "time" is generally used for many close but different concepts, including:

  • instant[54] as an object—one point on the time axes. Being an object, it has no value;
  • time interval[55] as an object—part of the time axes limited by two instants. Being an object, it has no value;
  • date[56] as a quantity characterizing an instant. As a quantity, it has a value which may be expressed in a variety of ways, for example "2014-04-26T09:42:36,75" in ISO standard format, or more colloquially such as "today, 9:42 a.m.";
  • duration[57] as a quantity characterizing a time interval.[58] As a quantity, it has a value, such as a number of minutes, or may be described in terms of the quantities (such as times and dates) of its beginning and end.



Production Events must be recorded and they must be time-stamped.  As the Object moves through the Production Events in a progression a value is incurred related to both the Cost Activity of being funded and the Benefit Activity of gaining a delivery position.  If an object had no benefit it would not be delivered.  The only way to recover cost is to generate the leveraged value of delivery to a market position.  Measuring the requirements and managing the process requires RECORD KEEPING.




There is also within the same process the requirement to invest funds in an adaptive process that will meet the next level of demand in market position.  A platform is maintained in order to produce a value for subscribers and return a leveraged profit to the owner.  A fully leveraged system is required and the ONE System has as its primary advantage both the thru-put equation and the cost-efficient elimination of redundancy.  In terms of time this is very streamlined.  The String based theory of QLD is able to generate META materials as part of a production cycle.  There are no gaps in the supply chain (normally, under learning maturity progression.)

PI ANO

The interpretation of this expression is a Power Intelligent measure of a cycle as it runs to completion, or GO.  What is the unit of GO? 

Formula ONE as we have often pointed to is concerned with making the unit of GO a continuous cycle.  It takes a considerable workforce to deliver a quantum in a mega efficient unit of GO.

The one thing we have learned is that if you want to perform something well you need to practice well.  And so our work on Formula ONE, the Manifold and "GO" is a learning exercise.  It also helps us monitor the thinking or philosophy of Time and Materials that has changed over the years.

Many of the changes which point to Qve and Quantum Formulation started here (1944 plus 72 = 2016+).  We believe that the Theory of Everything is wrapped up in the forensic delivery of a quantum based string generation and production delivery system. Green Technologies point us to this delivery system.

To understand in more detail we need to think about MEDIA Delivery or Production in that the elements are arranged around timelines and Server based solutions.  Then a more complete picture of how Qve Virtual Glass, Fusion Elements and Design work together with Photosynthetic Virtualization.




Now we have a view as to subassemblies and the manifest delivery of the production meeting together in the manifold design to complete the process; Time and Active dimensions of Motion.

However, this is so mega-plex in design, Game Theory has to be employed.

next, discussion of Game Theory

We will return here with additional analysis of the 3 remaining map views...

We reviewed our Metrics to see if they correspond to the cube and to the gap. All of our Process RUN to Pascal Cube looks good so far, with a better Grover Progression. 


Interim Analysis


read also:



Disclaimer: Blog material is presented as the basis of discussion material and is not to be construed as advice, counsel or education, and may at times be misconstrued if read in a context different than the writer's intent. No portion of this blog has been knowingly reproduced. Any resemblance to a specific company or entity is purely coincidental